|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 13, 2004
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Bethea v. Olmstead, CV020169072S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Carlson v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020189484S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a zoning appeal, a landowner failed to meet the two-prong test of aggrievement where he could not demonstrate a specific, personal, and legal interest as opposed to the general interest of the community.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dickinson v. Volicella, CV020516604S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: While defendant could desire to have more specificity in the complaint as to alleged violation of a statute regarding damages as a result of traffic violations, the statute did not require such specificity. Defendant's motion to strike was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback