 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Briga v. D'Amico, CV040083317,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the additions to a proposal constituted a counter-offer that had not been accepted by the contractor, who had already begun work on the project and was not told of the additions, and the continued work of the contractor on the project did not constitute an acceptance of the counteroffer, the contractor did not breach any contract.
|
|||||
| Desimini v. Bristol Hosp., Inc., HHBCV054003250S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital's summary judgment motion in a wrongful death action by an executrix was denied as the hospital did not have a vested property right in a two-year statute of limitations under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-555(a). Further, the automatic 90-day extension in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-190a(b) did not give rise to a violation of constitutional rights.
|
|||||
| Gildea v. Gildea, FSTFA990174546S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the court concluded that it lacked authority under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-81 to issue postjudgment orders regarding the parties' personal property long after the time of dissolution, it found that the personal property issues were severable from the other financial orders.
|
|||||
| La Fontaine v. La Fontaine, FA030477510S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ex-wife's evidence was insufficient for contempt. Orders were vague on ex-husband's obligations or he did not violate them; only willful violation was failure to pay alimony and child support for two weeks. Additional weekly payments were ordered to cover arrearage, but attorney fee award under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-87 for the contempt was denied.
|
|||||
| Maint. Techs. Int'l, LLC v. Vega, CV054005177S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An injunction, under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-471 et seq., to enforce a covenant not to compete that barred an employee's competition within 150 miles was proper as the geographical extent, employer's protection, restraint on the employee's ability to work, and interference with the public interest were reasonable, but its duration could be too long.
|
|||||
| Manko v. Ficarra, CV040488136S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney whose negligence caused the dismissal of a motorist's meritorious personal injury action was liable to the motorist in the amount of damages that the motorist was likely to have recovered in the action that had been dismissed.
|
|||||
| Mates v. Syed, CV044001655S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Coworker was granted summary judgment in a corrections officer's defamation action against the coworker because the alleged defamatory statements made by the coworker were made in furtherance of a quasi-judicial proceeding. Therefore, the coworker's statements were absolutely privileged.
|
|||||
| Old Lot No. 30, LLC v. Town of Ellington, CV010076261S, CV010076260S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In landowners' appeal of a tax assessment pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-119, from May 1, 2000, until April 19, 2001, the subject parcels were not classified as forest land by the state forester, and, therefore, could not have been assessed as such by the town. The tax assessor had to continue until re-classified by the state forester.
|
|||||
| Raffa v. Bidwell Indus. Group, Inc., CV040103627,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 12, 2006, Decided , January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employee did not show that she was fired for filing a workers' compensation claim, contrary to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-290a, because the employer showed it fired her for lack of work and that this reason was not pretextual or unworthy of belief, and the employee did not prove directly that a discriminatory reason motivated the employer's decision.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
