 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Block v. Bradford, CV064020389S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a former employee proved that he had an agreement with the management company as the company agreed to pay him a percentage of a management fee in exchange for his keeping a shopping center owner as a client, the company breached its contract by failing to pay for the final two months of the management agreement.
|
|||||
| Ge v. Iec Elecs., Inc., CV030827794S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action regarding malfunctioning circuit boards, defendant was not entitled to summary judgment on breach of contract and breach of express and implied warranty claims as material issues of fact existed; summary judgment was, however, proper on CUTPA claim as breach of contract claim alone was insufficient under "cigarette rule."
|
|||||
| Harper v. Harper, FA990071631S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action between divorced parents, it was clear that the original shared parenting plan was unworkable. Such a plan required some level of cooperation between the parents which did not exist. The prior orders needed to be modified to best serve the interests of the children.
|
|||||
| Luca's Steakhouse, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Greenwich, FSTCV054005358S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a town planning and zoning commission improperly rejected property owners' parking space calculations in support of the owners' application for a special permit and related site plan pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-3, there were still valid grounds to support the commission's denial of the application.
|
|||||
| Luca's Steakhouse, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Greenwich, CV04019992S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Restaurant's appeal of planning and zoning board of appeals (PZBA) affirmation of cease and desist order was denied; substantial evidence supported PZBA decision as restaurant's many interactions with zoning commission showed it knew what was necessary to comply with approvals for alteration, including retention of two apartments on second floor.
|
|||||
| Palmero v. Town of New Canaan, FSTCV045000049S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Richer v. Richer, MMXFA044001154,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former husband's contempt motion against former wife for her failure to comply with orders regarding reregistration of a vehicle and return of veteran's plates that were on the vehicle to the husband was denied. Wife did not willfully disobey orders as tax liabilities prevented change of registration and she had to surrender plates to the state.
|
|||||
| Rodriguez v. City of Meriden, CV054003837S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schwartz v. Allyn, 4005029,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of a real estate broker and his clients on their claims against a potential buyer who, without authority, recorded a copy of a land purchase option on land records; the option constituted a false statement, it was filed with malice, and it caused both the broker and the clients to suffer special damages.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
