 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., AC 23434,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 13, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where claimant was in coma and no one else was able to access his individual retirement account, account could not be considered in determining claimant's eligibility under general assistance program, as account was beyond claimant's control.
|
|||||
| Greene v. Thornton, FA030069920,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The allegations in a grandfather's complaint were not sufficient to invoke the court's jurisdiction to determine visitation. The allegations were silent as to the mother's fitness and were conclusory and non-specific as to the "substantial harm."
|
|||||
| In re Haley B., AC 22274,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 13, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given the grandmother's failure to comply with the department of children and families' guidelines, it was in the best interest of the child that guardianship remain with the commissioner of children and families.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Kramer, SC 16872,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 13, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in reducing a jury's award in a personal injury action based on collateral source payments because the jury awarded economic damages without delineating the amount awarded for each specific item of damages.
|
|||||
| Labbe v. St. Vincent Med. Ctr., CV020397829,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee allowed both a judicial and an administrative action against the employer to proceed simultaneously for five months, the employee did not make a good faith effort to exhaust her administrative remedy.
|
|||||
| Lauria v. W. Rock Health, Inc., CV03082278,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion to strike was granted where a patient failed to file a good faith certificate in suing a health care provider for medical malpractice. The motion was denied where the patient properly asserted a claim for ordinary negligence.
|
|||||
| Lyke v. Cianciolo, CV020395810,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver's motion to set aside a verdict in favor of an injured party in a personal injury action or for a remittitur was denied; the judgment in favor of the injured party properly included medical bills for palliative care and treatment.
|
|||||
| Martel Enters. v. Szpak, CV010096005,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A corporation and builders were awarded damages and interest where the consumer did not pay for work as agreed by the parties' sons, but allowed to work to continue without payment, while trying to take advantage of the trust in her son's friendship.
|
|||||
| Masonic Healthcare v. Latham, CV030479031S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2004, Decided , January 13, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A conservator's motion to strike a care center's complaint for monies spent for care provided to the conservator's ward, who had since died, was denied because a claim for a breach of fiduciary duty during the ward's life was not precluded.
|
|||||
| McCart v. City of Shelton, AC 23694,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 13, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where 73 property owners challenged city's assessments for installation of sewers as being too high, owners were improperly joined. There was no common question of law or fact because owners had to provide individual evidence on each property.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
