 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tobing v. Lange, X09CV065002163,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT HARTFORD, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As medical malpractice plaintiffs filed an affidavit from a neurosurgeon in their complaint against defendant neurologists, the affidavit was not by a "similar health care provider" under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-184c(c) and was insufficient to avoid dismissal under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-190a, as amended by 2005 Conn. Acts 275, § 2.
|
|||||
| Treat v. Tomaszewsky, CV064006097S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 11, 2007, Decided , January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Temporary injunction to prohibit respondent's use of business name similar to that of petitioner was denied; both parties had the right to use their own identical initials in the names of their landscape businesses, and as petitioner failed to establish his service had acquired a widespread reputation, exception to that right did not apply.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
