|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 13, 2000
|
| |
Archie v. Yale New Haven Hosp., CV 990430379S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The court dismissed a civil complaint because, though plaintiff could amend her complaint to correct for a defective return date, plaintiff waited until after the two-month period in which to do so had expired.
|
|
| |
Covelli v. Gavin, CV 980492271S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff was liable for tax assessment under the Marijuana and Controlled Substance Tax as a dealer in possession of more than seven grams of cocaine.
|
|
| |
Dowd v. D'Addeo, CV 990088165,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts to support a claim that defendants breached a covenant of warranty, nor were the covenants of encumbrances and the right to convey breached.
|
|
| |
Ervin v. Rockville Orthopedic Assocs., P.C., CV 9764982S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Upon termination of employment, the employee was entitled to payment for unused sick days and unused vacation days in accordance with defendant's personnel policy handbook.
|
|
| |
Esposito v. Esposito, FA 76149613S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to modify the alimony order was granted, since there was a substantial change in the parties' financial circumstances, including defendant's improved finances and increased ability to support herself.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lee v. Lee, FA 980418698,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Marriage of parties was dissolved, and their property was distributed. Wife was awarded custody of minor children, and father was ordered to pay child support, child support arrearage, and alimony.
|
|
| |
Lowinger v. Century Communs. Corp., X06CV 990153534S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Action for breach of fiduciary duty for amount of premium paid to shareholders following merger was barred because it was encompassed within appraisal action which was exclusive statutory remedy.
|
|
| |
McGinty v. McGinty, FA 960149771S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Ex-husband was ordered to pay ex-wife child support in the amount of $ 228 per week in accordance with the Connecticut Child Support Guidelines.
|
|
| |
Multi-Unit Serv. v. First Union Bank, CV 970342492,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a right to compensation resulted from the performance of plaintiff's duty as a court appointed receiver of rents, plaintiff had to obtain judicial permission before bringing a separate cause of action to recover fees.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|