 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bolmer v. McKulsky, (AC 22435),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly directed verdict for motorist on injured driver's common law and statutory recklessness claims, as evidence did not show that the motorist acted with a reckless disregard for safety of others or for consequences of his acts.
|
|||||
| Borden v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 558530,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied motion to reopen earlier judgment denying owner's appeal of zoning commission's approval of site plan; since zoning regulations provided for appeal to zoning board, remedy had to be exhausted in spite of recent legislation.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the practice group attempted to supplement its initial response to the health care insurer's interrogatories in practice group's brief in opposition to motion to compel discovery, practice group did not properly supplement its initial response.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a medical center set forth information in a brief in opposition, did not provide narrative answers, referred to deposition testimony, and was ambiguous and unresponsive, its responses were insufficient.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Doctor's reference to several exhibits in response to interrogatories was unresponsive; he should have identified specific parts of exhibits where information was located. Information in brief opposing motion to compel was not proper supplementation.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted defendant's motion to compel discovery because the plaintiff failed to adequately provide information in responses to interrogatories and in the production of documents.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found that a medical practice failed to comply with discovery and ordered it to provide narrative answers in proper form and responsive, unambiguous answers.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Doctor's reference to several exhibits in response to interrogatories was unresponsive; he should have identified specific parts of exhibits where information was located. Information in brief opposing motion to compel was not proper supplementation.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the practice group attempted to supplement its initial response to the health care insurer's interrogatories in practice group's brief in opposition to motion to compel discovery, practice group did not properly supplement its initial response.
|
|||||
| Forstadt v. Devito, CV020188367,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike counts alleging unfair trade practices in plaintiffs' personal injury action was denied, because granting the motion would have thwarted judicial economy, so joinder of those claims was allowable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
