|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 12, 2005
|
| |
Ciolino v. Ciolino, FA980147294S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 12, 2005, Decided , January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the parties agreed that a husband was entitled to two income tax dependency deductions and the wife was entitled to one such deduction unless she remarried, the wife was not entitled to a modification based on the husband's remarriage. The language clearly and unambiguously stated that only the wife's remarriage could trigger modification.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Douton v. Norris, CV030566914S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 12, 2005, Decided , January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where neither property owners nor their neighbor met their burden of proving the irreparable harm necessary to issue an injunction regarding the use of an easement over the neighbor's property, such was denied, and the court ordered no relief.
|
|
| |
E&W Constr., Inc. v. Purcell, CV030101172S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 12, 2005, Decided , January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The trial court could not enforce a settlement agreement that property owners refused to sign in a breach of contract action. Based on the inconclusive nature of the disjointed back and forth communication between the former attorney and one owner, it could not be concluded that there was a meeting of the minds as to the settlement terms.
|
|
| |
Ereshena v. AC&S, Inc., CV000374298S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In executrix's product liability asbestos suit against company, summary judgment under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ? 17-49 was granted where there was no admissible evidence linking company's product to decedent or decedent's work sites, and thus, executrix could not show that the decedent inhaled asbestos dust from the company's product.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Leasecomm Corp. v. Watkins, CV040085843,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 12, 2005, Decided , January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike a president's jury claim was denied where, while lease containing personal guaranty signed by president contained provision waiving jury trial, president showed that she was inexperienced business person, that she did not consult attorney to review lease, and that personal guaranty section, which she signed, did not contain waiver.
|
|
| |
Mucherino v. Newell, CV189843,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 18 AT BANTAM, January 12, 2005, Decided , January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owner was ordered to immediately restore his premises, which were used by a business to operate the same, after he damaged fences, gates, a barn, stalls, and an indoor arena thereon which deprived the business of its possession and enjoyment under Conn. Gen. Stat. ??47a-43. Double damages under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 47a-46 were ordered.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Osorio v. Johnson, FA030193081S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 12, 2005, Decided , January 12, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In dissolving a husband and a wife's marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, the court ordered the husband to pay the wife $ 5,000 per month in alimony for four years where she was a homemaker and he had a considerable salary.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback