 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Crespan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., LLICV054002121S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though an insured alleged sufficient facts to show that insurer did not fulfill its contractual obligation to make medical payments under a motor vehicle policy, or that it conducted a negligent investigation before denying payment, the allegations did not support a conclusion of dishonesty or sinister motive; insured's bad faith claim was struck.
|
|||||
| D'Amico v. Corneroli, X04MMXCV054003439S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Gallery owner's motion for summary judgment as to claims by plaintiffs seeking to recover a painting allegedly stolen from a decedent was denied, because an earlier New York action by an alleged partner of the decedent did not have preclusive effect, as there was no privity between the alleged party and the plaintiffs in this action.
|
|||||
| Ezekowitz v. Ezekowitz, FSTFA044001173S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the evidence indicated that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, the marriage was dissolved the marriage on that ground. Since the husband's monthly income was adequate to pay her whatever periodic alimony she needed, the wife was awarded $ 5,000 per month alimony.
|
|||||
| Fowler v. Fowler, FA044000932S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the wife grossed $ 250 per week, where the husband received Social Security disability benefits, where the marriage was short, and where the only substantial asset was the marital home purchased by the husband before the marriage, the husband was awarded the home, he was to make a $ 10,000 payment to the wife, and no alimony was awarded.
|
|||||
| Freeman v. Warden, State Prison, CV040004548S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied because an inmate did not show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in sentencing where nothing besides the inmate's own testimony indicated that a sentence should have been concurrent instead of consecutive.
|
|||||
| Germaine v. Thygerson, CV040092915S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence established that a subcontractor/employer did not suffer any harm by the alleged negligence of the attorneys in regard to their failure to argue that a contractor and/or homeowners were responsible in a workers' compensation action because the subcontractor was the party primarily liable for the benefits under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-291.
|
|||||
| SNET Info. Servs. v. ALS Contr., LLC, CV044006705S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon the evidence presented, via a tape-recorded telephone call, that a customer ordered advertising through its managing member from an advertiser, but that payment had been due and owing, the past due amount was awarded, plus interest at 6 percent, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 37-3a, as well as attorney's fees, under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-251.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Smith, FA054008275S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce case, under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-81(c), superior court found it fair and equitable to award wife an LLC, a dump trucking business, and its assets and ordered that truck loan be paid off and husband repaid $ 25,000 balance of his contribution toward purchase of truck. His financial interest was secured by a promissory note and a lien.
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. F.F. Acquistion Corp., CV040286450S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
