 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allstate Ins. Co. v. Thuillard, CV054018974S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the term "an insured person" was ambiguous, as it did not make it clear that the exclusion applied to any insureds whose conduct might have been a cause of a complained of injury, even where an insured's conduct may have involved no element of intent or criminality, summary judgment was denied as to the homeowners whose son murdered someone.
|
|||||
| Cars for Less & Servs. v. Last Chance Garage, LLC, CVH7302,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a landlord made a reasonable attempt to serve the tenants and the marshal served them at the business address at issue and their place of abode, and service was not so haphazard and uncertain as to fail to meet the requirements of valid service within the purview of the statute, the tenants failed to overcome a presumption of valid service.
|
|||||
| Chin v. Landolfi, CV0550003,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Conn. Light & Power Co. v. Westview Carlton Group, LLC, CV020469715S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in excess of the offer of judgment that was rejected by the defendants, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-192a(b), the plaintiff was entitled to recover offer of judgment interest at the rate of 12 percent per year on the principal amount recovered, attorneys' fees, and taxable costs.
|
|||||
| Cormier v. Hohenthal, CVH7414,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted summary judgment to the landlords on a tenant's action to recover a security deposit pursuant to Con. Gen. Stat. 47a-21 because the tenant's action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata based upon previous litigation between the parties regarding the tenancy.
|
|||||
| D'Agostino v. Broccoli, CV055001595S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion to strike plaintiff's claim of intentional interference with contractual rights by the executive director of a housing authority was granted, as plaintiff did not allege that the director acted outside the scope of his agency or that he used his power improperly for personal gain in allegedly interfering with plaintiff's employment.
|
|||||
| Dea & Assocs., LLC v. McCall, CVH7482,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A tenant who transacted business with an LLC that had not filed its articles of corporation at the time it entered into a lease, but did file them several months later, was estopped from denying the LLC's existence through her motion to dismiss. Generally, one who dealt with a de facto corporation was estopped to deny its corporate existence.
|
|||||
| Delcath Sys. v. Foltz, FSTCV064009802S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied a corporation's motion for a temporary injunction against a consultant because the evidence did not support claims that the consultant violated the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 35-50 et seq., as information in a press release prepared by the consultant had already been disclosed to investors.
|
|||||
| Dutko v. Milford Planning & Zoning, CV040084223S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's appeal was dismissed as owner commenced appeal by serving four copies of process on City clerk. Two of copies were for clerk, and remaining two were for board and board's chairman. As Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-8(f)(1) required personal or abode service on chairman or clerk of board, service was improper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
