|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 13, 2000
|
| |
New England Bank v. Zivic, CV 990079036S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mortgagee's motion for strict foreclosure denied and foreclosure by sale was ordered because using either party's appraisal, value of inn, furnishings, and excess real property exceeded debt owed by a sufficient amount.
|
|
| |
Norwich Hous. Auth. v. Majewski, CV 219883,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Judgment of possession entered for housing authority, because lessee breached lease by not obtaining authorization for a guest to stay in the apartment for more than seven total days per month.
|
|
| |
Thirty-Three Main St. v. Commissoner of Transp., CV 98008689,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a condemnation action, plaintiff was awarded another $ 175,000 over the $ 200,000 already paid for its property in a condemnation action, based upon the court's considered opinion of the value of the property.
|
|
| |
|
| |
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Stone, CV 970407846,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2000, Decided , January 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insurer's motion for summary judgment was granted as to basic reparation benefits it paid to insureds prior to repeal of statute, because repeal did not destroy right to subrogation that vested upon payment of benefits.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|