 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Foster v. Foster, FA010558204S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not in a minor child's best interests to transfer the child from her mother to either her paternal grandparents or to her father.
|
|||||
| Guerrera v. Guilford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020459541S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported approval by Guilford Planning and Zoning Commission (Connecticut) of a landowner's coastal site plan application, as her new septic system would reduce pollution concerns and plan complied with local zoning regulations.
|
|||||
| Jtl Servs. v. Wilder Balter Partners, CV020516164S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client was not entitled to summary judgment on recruiter's breach of contract action where the agreement between the parties was ambiguous as to the exact position or positions covered by the agreement and there was no termination date in agreement.
|
|||||
| Korem v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency, CV020815546,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The property owners' appeal was premature as the inland wetlands & watercourses commission had not rendered an appealable final decision as to the order directing the owners to cease the erection of a barn within a wetlands regulated area.
|
|||||
| Morris v. Morris, (SC 16744),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a trial court improperly relied on parties' gross income, rather than their net income, in determining whether there was a change in circumstances that justified a modification of child support, reversal was required.
|
|||||
| Muller v. Olympus Healthcare Group, CV0072945S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An amended complaint survived a motion to strike, as it was based on negligent reporting and did not implicate the immunity. An executor's claims that a doctor negligently failed to inform him of his father's health survived the motion.
|
|||||
| Rotini v. Scinto, CV010381052S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver failed to state legally sufficient claim for indemnification. She had not alleged facts which would support finding that owner was in exclusive control of situation, or that driver did not know, and had no reason to know of owner's negligence.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Allstate Indem. Co., CV980354137S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied insurer's motion (after insurer's and insured's agreement) to vacate prior order granting motion to strike unfair insurance (but not unfair trade) practice count; vacatur in response to settlements violated public policy.
|
|||||
| State v. Ashe, (AC 22784),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's convictions for murder, conspiracy, and assault were upheld where the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's determination and the prosecutor's argument did not violate due process.
|
|||||
| State v. Gasser, (AC 22492),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's actions in investigating accident involving defendant did not fall below objective standard of reasonableness where attorney had numerous discussions with defendant, reviewed various police and medical reports, and examined accident scene.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
