 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Van Winkle v. Town of Stonington, CV030567071S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's appeal of a tax assessment by a town board of assessment appeals was dismissed as the property in the town was valued in compliance with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-62a(b) so that there was no violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-119. Further, there was no evidence which supported the owner's claim of an Equal Protection Clause violation.
|
|||||
| Wysocki v. Saxon, CV020079517S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 13, 2006, Decided , January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to open a judgment dismissing his action was denied where motion made no showing that a good cause of action existed, and the only explanation for failure to comply with unambiguous court order requiring a certificate of closed pleadings and a trial list was that plaintiff's counsel believed that it did not serve any purpose.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
