 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Kaminski, AC 27627,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was probable cause evidence of crime would be found on electronic items as affidavit alleged defendant took photos of 14-year-old girl wearing man's button-down shirt and thong panties, and police knew defendant had prior conviction for sexually assaulting young girl and had evidence defendant purchased access to pornographic Internet site.
|
|||||
| State v. Nieves, AC 28463,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fact defendant was only one in photo array wearing turtleneck and his picture was placed in center of array did not make array unnecessarily suggestive, in violation of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process or fair trial. Claim jury was improperly instructed on thoroughness of investigation did not amount to constitutional violation.
|
|||||
| State v. Scheck, AC 27595,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of attempt to commit assault as an accessory and conspiracy to commit assault because a jury reasonably could have found that he intended to aid an accomplice and seriously injure the victim. Evidence of the victim's alleged assault was properly excluded as irrelevant to defendant's defense that he lacked intent.
|
|||||
| Wiltzius v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals , AC 27787, AC 27788, AC 27789,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a neighbor filed his appeals from the issuance of the certificates of zoning compliance within the requisite 30 day period set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 8-7, the issuance of the certificates of zoning compliance by the zoning enforcement officer constituted appealable decisions pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 8-6.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
