 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Celentano v. Oaks Condo. Ass'n, X01CV940159297,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT WATERBURY, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found that although the purchase option was timely exercised, the condominium association members failed to bring a timely action for specific performance. Also, the limitation was not tolled by operation of estoppel.
|
|||||
| Citimortage, Inc. v. Dephillips, 070306S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendants' special defenses alleged conclusions of law without supporting facts, plaintiff's motion to strike was granted.
|
|||||
| Hurst v. Kingsland Co., CV960072465S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In negligence and products liability action, apportionment complaint was dismissed. Plaintiff's amended complaint was not dismissed because products liability claims were not derivative of improperly-filed apportionment complaint.
|
|||||
| McCall v. City of Danbury, CV990334254S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's racial discrimination action against defendants, city and police department, was barred by the doctrine of res judicata where he had a fair opportunity to litigate the claim in his former federal action.
|
|||||
| New Milford Sav. Bank v. Zandy, CV990078766S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a foreclosure action, the court granted a bank's motion to dismiss borrowers' counterclaims based upon the bank not having a fiduciary or contractual duty to disclose its history with the property or its prior owners to borrowers.
|
|||||
| Oguagha v. Oguagha, FA000378945S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered husband and wife to pay certain expenses in connection with a divorce action filed by husband against wife and in response to a motion filed by one party.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
