 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| AvalonBay Cmtys., Inc. v. Milford Inland Wetlands Agency, CV020514398S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Over 52 conditions imposed upon the approval of an application to build a residential community were invalid because they were based on the protection of the eastern box turtle, which was not a valid concern of the wetlands agency.
|
|||||
| Avalonbay Cmtys., Inc. v. Milford Planning & Zoning Bd., CV020514399S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for review of the denial of a developer's applications for a zoning change were considered to be affordable housing appeals as they met the definition of "affordable housing" as it existed on the date the applications were filed.
|
|||||
| Buttendorf Bldg. & Remodeling, LLC v. DeSilva, CV020394286S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a contract suit, the clients breached the contract by stopping payment on a check to the builder and by ordering one of the builder's employees off their property. The builder was awarded damages for the contract price for the work performed.
|
|||||
| Found. Enters., LLC v. Hall Neighborhood House, Inc., CV030402677,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a breach of contract action under a bilateral contract, where plaintiff failed to allege that it performed its duties under the contract, plaintiff thereby failed to plead a legally cognizable claim in contract and the complaint was struck.
|
|||||
| Larobina v. First Union Nat'l Bank, CV990170845S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's special defenses of failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, statute of limitations, preemption, doctrine of unclean hands, and estoppel were all struck for failure to provide subordinate facts.
|
|||||
| McClure v. Fairfield Univ., CV000159028S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: University's summary judgment motion was granted as to a student's personal injury action, because the student had already recovered for the same injuries in an arbitration action against a driver and the driver's insurance company.
|
|||||
| Santiago v. Lopez, FA030177665S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties' marriage was irretrievably broken down, it was dissolved; the wife was to have sole legal and physical custody of the minor children, the husband was to have visitation rights, and the parties' property was distributed.
|
|||||
| Sukosky v. Sukosky, FA000725716S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's motion to modify his child support obligation was denied; the father had voluntarily reduced his income, and the family court chose to deviate from the child support guidelines based on the father's imputed income.
|
|||||
| Zemmel v. SSHC, Inc., CV030102952,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 14, 2004, Decided , January 14, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court decided that $ 130,000 prejudgment attachment remedy could issue against tenant and $ 40,000 prejudgment remedy against lease guarantor in favor of landlord; three-day notice to quit did not bar suit for lease contract damages.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
