 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. O'Neil, (SC 16607),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court found that appellate court properly reversed conviction for attempt to commit murder, as defendant's sending of letter which asked man to kill witness was mere solicitation, which, by itself, did not constitute attempt to commit murder.
|
|||||
| State v. Vargas, (AC 22236),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Formal agreement did not need to be proved for a conspiracy charge. A showing that conspirators knowingly engaged in a plan to commit a crime was sufficient. Conviction was affirmed where State proved an agreement through co-conspirator's testimony.
|
|||||
| Town of Redding v. Elfire, (AC 21912),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 14, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In foreclosure action, trial court erred in granting summary judgment where evidence submitted in opposition provided evidentiary foundation demonstrating genuine issue of material fact existed as to description of property subject of foreclosure.
|
|||||
| Warner v. Block, (X02)CV020174320S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was evidence of clandestine financial dealings and diversion of funds, it was necessary and appropriate to appoint a receiver; the court could appoint a receiver for the partnership even though it was named as a plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Zupaniotis v. Comm'r of Transp., CV010185037S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 14, 2003, Decided , January 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Request that court reevaluate its position on timeliness of assessment appeal was denied. Plaintiffs never received the statutory notice of assessment from the superior court, and did not have or receive actual notice of the filing of the assessment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
