|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 14, 2000
|
| |
Carlos S., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Petition for termination of mother's and fathers' parental rights was granted because the children's best interests would be served by termination of those rights.
|
|
| |
Citizen's Bank v. Trevolitz, CV 98061969S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff bank's motion for summary judgment was denied as to the second loan, brcause there was a question of fact as to whether defendant was to be charged with knowledge of the guarantee agreement's contents.
|
|
| |
Conners v. Conners, FA 990428193S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Diamond A., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Petition to terminate parental rights was granted, because reasonable reunification efforts were made, statutory grounds were proven by clear and convincing evidence, and it was in best interests of child to terminate rights.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Henry v. Henry, FA 920310236S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to modify alimony was granted after the court found substantial changes in circumstances resulting from defendant's heart attack and resulting inability to work.
|
|
| |
Horn v. Horn, FA 970330011S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Kmk Insulation v. Aark Constr., CV 980168702,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Murphy v. Murphy, FA 960154640S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In marriage dissolution, wife was not entitled to permanent alimony, but was entitled to compensation for efforts to establish husband's landscaping business; no imputed income was awarded for husband's rent-free residence.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
