|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 12, 2001
|
| |
Chief of Police v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, CV990497252S, CV990497253S, CV990497389S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiffs were not exempt from disclosure of documents and records sought by defendants under the Freedom of Information Act; the records were compiled pursuant to Megan's Law, and not in connection with detection or investigation of a crime.
|
|
| |
Department of Pub. Utils. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, CV990498510S, CV990498511S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Individuals' request for public utility's documents that were not exempt under FOIA should have been granted. Appeal was timely and documents not trade secrets.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Green v. Giuliani, 0118337,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Based on the testimony of both husband and wife that a 27-year-old marriage had broken down beyond repair, dissolution was granted.
|
|
| |
Green v. Habitat for Humanity for Greater New Haven, CV000434513,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion to strike was granted where plaintiff's recklessness claim was barred by the statute of limitations, and she failed to state a claim in nuisance because she had no public right to be on defendant's property.
|
|
| |
Hayes v. Caspers, Ltd., CV000553769S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike was denied as father of son who died from ingesting alcohol and a dietary supplement, given to him by his friend, sufficiently alleged duty, breach, causation, actual injury and thus, a cause of action for negligence.
|
|
| |
Healthright, Inc. v. Executive Risk Specialty Ins. Co., CV000272486S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insurance companies' motions to strike health group's claims of unfair insurance and trade practices were granted. Assurance did not amount to misrepresentation, and breach of contract claim did not support CUTPA cause of action.
|
|
| |
Holt v. Levine, CV000092320,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Connecticut nurse who provided counseling services was potentially liable for professional malpractice (good faith certificate was not required), breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair business practices.
|
|
| |
In re Keisha M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Biological mother failed to rehabilitate her mental illness and substance abuse, the two problems impairing her ability to be a good parent. Thus, it was in her children's best interest that her parental rights be terminated.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|