 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baldwin v. Warden, Corrigan Corr. Inst., 0565115,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Battista v. Battista, FA030127477,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 13, 2005, Decided , January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the parties' marriage had broken down irretrievably, it was ordered dissolved. A significant factor in the breakdown of the marriage was the wife's behavior during the marriage, which included having an extramarital affair.
|
|||||
| Baxter v. Bernier, CV030286030S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 13, 2005, Decided , January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court granted defendant's motion to dismiss suit on ground that service of process was not made at her usual place of abode, as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-54, where defendant's affidavit to effect that she had earlier moved from place where service was made sufficiently contradicted sheriff's return showing service at usual place of abode.
|
|||||
| Bedard v. Bedard, FA040182621S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 13, 2005, Decided , January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court dissolved a husband and wife's marriage after determining that the marriage had broken down irretrievably. Because the husband was primarily responsible for the breakdown of the marriage, the court held that he was to receive 45 percent of the net proceeds from the sale of the marital residence, with the wife receiving 55 percent.
|
|||||
| Boyd v. Comm'r of Corr., CV000443013S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 13, 2005, Decided , January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board of Parole could not be compelled to grant an inmate an immediate parole hearing where the Board's conclusion that the inmate's release would not be compatible with the welfare of society was proper, in that the inmate had three parole violations. The court could not question the Board in setting the hearing date 10 years later.
|
|||||
| Crone v. Abate, CV030080966S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit brought after paint booth, which was located on a property owner's property but which had been recently sold to buyer, collapsed, summary judgment under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-49 for owner was denied where factual issues existed about whether owner was sufficiently in control of area of instrumentality that caused injury.
|
|||||
| Gavigan v. Fleet Nat'l Bank, CV044001158S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 13, 2005, Decided , January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Giannamore v. Samuel, FA044002514S, FA044002525,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother was drug addict who had been clean for one year and where father had previously supplied her with drugs, mother's application for temporary restraining order against him was denied. Because mother had not received drugs from anyone in months, continuous and present threat of injury under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-15 was not established.
|
|||||
| Int'l Union, Local 91 v. State Elevator Work Examining Bd., CV010809162S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 13, 2005, Decided , January 13, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no applicable apprenticeship program in Connecticut, what amounted to "equivalent experience" qualifying an applicant to take an examination for an R-2 license to do elevator repair, installation, and maintenance work was a matter for the State Elevator Installation, Repair and Maintenance Work Examining Board's discretion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
