 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon, (AC 25864),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since, in a prior case between the same parties, the validity of a lease regarding parking spaces was upheld, lessor could not again challenge validity of lease simply because the town sent a letter that the parking spaces violated zoning laws; res judicata prevented second suit and lessee was properly awarded attorney fees for a bad faith suit.
|
|||||
| Archambault v. Konover Constr. Corp., X04CV990103454S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Archambault v. Konover Constr. Corp., X04CV990103454S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A general contractor was not entitled to remittitur under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-216a where the damages of $ 3,450,000 were based on the evidence and were not excessive as the jury could have determined that an injured worker could no longer work and that he had significant permanent pain at the time of the trial some six years after the accident.
|
|||||
| Archambault v. Konover Constr. Corp., X04CV990103454S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Capital Prop. Assocs. v. Capital City Econ. Dev. Auth., X07CV044001923S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A company was not required to seek permission to sue a state agency under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-142 because Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-61 permitted suits on public contracts if proper notice was given; the notice given did not have to reference § 4-61 in order to be sufficient.
|
|||||
| Cushman v. Cushman, (AC 25541),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found a husband in contempt of court for failing to pay required alimony, as the court properly considered the Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-82 factors in determining that the wife's circumstances had not changed substantially, and properly found that the husband failed to show that cohabitation altered her financial needs.
|
|||||
| Distinctive Kitchen Designs, LLC v. Gaudio, CV044000839S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: LLC's violations of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-429 in failing to obtain the signature of one of the property owners, and the failure to include a starting and finishing date to work under the contract, were technical and did not amount to a level of noncompliance to require the LLC to forfeit the amount due it for work performed.
|
|||||
| Gurguis v. Frankel, (AC 25405),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the evidence was insufficient to prove that the contractor's failure to warn of the declivity was the proximate cause of her injuries, since the injured person stated a gust of wind from a passing truck caused her to lose control of her vehicle, the trial court improperly rendered judgment in favor of the injured persons.
|
|||||
| Henderson v. Henderson, FA960079669S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the father was obligated under the parties' separation agreement and under two court orders to have tax liens removed from the mother's property and where evidence indicated that he had failed to do so, the father was ordered to appear at a hearing to show cause why he should not be held in contempt.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
