Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Connecticut - March 24, 2009
  
Auerbach v. Auerbach, AC 28497, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: As an ex-husband's financial situation had so deteriorated that he was unable to comply with the unallocated alimony and support obligations previously ordered by the court, his motion for modification of alimony and support was properly granted under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 46b-86.

Search Cases for Free
  
Boczer v. Sella, AC 29295, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Assessment of expert witness fees as costs was error because Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-260(f) required a determination of reasonableness of such fees, the invoices submitted did not establish that the costs were reasonable, and no additional evidence or testimony was submitted to establish that the requested expert witness fees were reasonable.

Search Cases for Free
  
George M. v. Comm'r of Corr., SC 17941, SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Gold v. Town of E. Haddam, SC 18067, SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Gyerko v. Gyerko, AC 28693, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: As the trial court found, inter alia, that the husband destroyed interior portions of the home while enraged, that the wife did all the cooking, cleaning and shopping, and that the husband verbally and physically abused the wife and their daughters, it did not abuse its discretion in making the financial awards under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 46b-81.

Search Cases for Free
  
Langewisch v. New Eng. Residential Servs., AC 29264, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in denying parents' Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-212(a) motion to open or to set aside dismissal of their wrongful death suit because, inter alia, as there was no explanation as to how or why the parents' request for an exemption from the docket management dismissal was not filed, the parents failed to establish a mistake.

Search Cases for Free
  
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lone Star Indus., SC 18199, SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Martino v. Scalzo, AC 29205, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court improperly raised and applied the statute of limitations contained in Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 42a-3-118(b) sua sponte because an executrix waived the application of the statute of limitations to a creditor's claim against an estate when she neither pleaded the statute of limitations nor apprised the creditor that it was at issue.

Search Cases for Free
  
St. Joseph's Living Ctr., Inc. v. Town of Windham, SC 17916, SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Burnell, SC 18139, SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.