 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Auerbach v. Auerbach, AC 28497,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As an ex-husband's financial situation had so deteriorated that he was unable to comply with the unallocated alimony and support obligations previously ordered by the court, his motion for modification of alimony and support was properly granted under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-86.
|
|||||
| Boczer v. Sella, AC 29295,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Assessment of expert witness fees as costs was error because Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-260(f) required a determination of reasonableness of such fees, the invoices submitted did not establish that the costs were reasonable, and no additional evidence or testimony was submitted to establish that the requested expert witness fees were reasonable.
|
|||||
| Gold v. Town of E. Haddam, SC 18067,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gyerko v. Gyerko, AC 28693,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the trial court found, inter alia, that the husband destroyed interior portions of the home while enraged, that the wife did all the cooking, cleaning and shopping, and that the husband verbally and physically abused the wife and their daughters, it did not abuse its discretion in making the financial awards under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-81.
|
|||||
| Langewisch v. New Eng. Residential Servs., AC 29264,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying parents' Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-212(a) motion to open or to set aside dismissal of their wrongful death suit because, inter alia, as there was no explanation as to how or why the parents' request for an exemption from the docket management dismissal was not filed, the parents failed to establish a mistake.
|
|||||
| Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lone Star Indus., SC 18199,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martino v. Scalzo, AC 29205,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court improperly raised and applied the statute of limitations contained in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42a-3-118(b) sua sponte because an executrix waived the application of the statute of limitations to a creditor's claim against an estate when she neither pleaded the statute of limitations nor apprised the creditor that it was at issue.
|
|||||
| St. Joseph's Living Ctr., Inc. v. Town of Windham, SC 17916,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Burnell, SC 18139,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
