|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 14, 2000
|
| |
|
| |
Oygard v. Town of Coventry, CV 950059237S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment was denied on citizens' claims that individual and municipal defendants tortiously interfered with contract between citizens and defendant town and breached covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
|
|
| |
Silva v. Hamel, FA 990334682S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court entered order establishing joint custody of minor child, designating mother as residential parent, granting father visitation rights, and establishing holiday schedule that had priority over normal weekend schedule.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Whitehurst v. Middletown Mfg. Co., CV 990088012S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 14, 2000, Decided , January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An employer was entitled to partial summary judgment on an employee's product liability claim because the employer was not in the business of manufacturing or distributing the machine that allegedly caused the employee's injury.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|