 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Luckert-Oswell v. Oswell, FA980719945,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted modification of child support order based upon a substantial change in circumstances. It determined the gross weekly income of the parties for calculation and ordered counsel to file worksheets based on the findings.
|
|||||
| Message Ctr. Mgmt., Inc. v. Shell Oil Prods. Co., CV970481611S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant showed that it would have suffered irreparable harm if it were not granted an injunction prohibiting plaintiff from continuing to act as its agent, injunction was granted.
|
|||||
| National Ass'n v. Waterford Bd. of Educ., 551699,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Teachers' union failed to present evidence that an arbitration panel appreciated the existence of a clearly governing legal principle, and chose to ignore it, and therefore, the arbitration award in favor of a school board was affirmed.
|
|||||
| National Ass'n v. Waterford Bd. of Educ., 550577,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to vacate arbitration award was denied where submission was unrestricted and award conformed to issue submitted to panel. However, as motion to vacate was denied, defendant's motion to confirm award was granted.
|
|||||
| Ridgefield Homes Realty v. Beardsley, CV970327416S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A real estate broker who performed services for a property owner was not entitled to recover on a theory of quantum meruit because there was an express contract in existence which covered the subject matter of the claim.
|
|||||
| SSB Assocs., Inc. v. Sound Commer. Real Estate, CV000181091,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was probable cause that a judgment in the amount of prejudgment remedy sought, taking into account known defenses, counterclaims, or set-offs, would be rendered in favor of applicant, applicant was granted prejudgment remedy.
|
|||||
| Silva v. New York Life Ins. Co., CV970342973S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was not proper where there were still material questions as to the nature of a conversation between an insurance agent and the office manager of her employer regarding the nature of the agent's termination from employment.
|
|||||
| State v. Stevenson, CR980530866,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2001, Decided , January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's motion for joinder of offenses was granted as the respective informations, and the factual basis of each, were legally connected. The evidence related to each of the informations was admissible in the other.
|
|||||
| Vonneida v. Estate of Harthon, CV990591031S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was denied where sister-in-law did not mean sister, the will was unambiguous, and a gift to plaintiff's mother lapsed and passed by intestacy.
|
|||||
| Westberg v. Dasilva, CV187066,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where credible evidence showed tenant did not notify landlord of his intent to vacate premises and terminate commercial lease, judgment entered in favor of landlord for unpaid rent, statutory interest, and attorneys fees, as set forth in lease.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
