 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Panettieri v. Fulton, FA010726743,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 15, 2003, Decided , January 15, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The child support and alimony order could not be modified due to the husband's change in financial circumstances as the order's language was clear and unambiguous that the payments were non-modifiable as to term and amount.
|
|||||
| Sanders v. Warden of Cheshire, CV980417904,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 15, 2003, Decided , January 15, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A habeas corpus petitioner was entitled to relief where he proved that his counsel was ineffective in failing to adequately inform him of a plea offer and the consequences thereof, and that he was prejudiced by such failure to inform.
|
|||||
| State v. Prat, CR970129130,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 15, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The sentence imposed on defendant's convictions of assault in the first degree and carrying a dangerous weapon was affirmed; taking into consideration the nature of the crime, the sentence was not inappropriate or disproportionate.
|
|||||
| Valentin v. Cmty. Remodeling Co., X01CV020172325S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 15, 2003, Decided , January 15, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The corporation's objection to the filing of the homeowner's revised complaint, regarding a home improvement contract, was overruled except as to three counts claiming assignee liability, which the homeowner was ordered to state in separate counts.
|
|||||
| Wiencke v. Coyner, FA010727880,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 15, 2003, Decided , January 15, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved, as the marriage had irretrievably broken down, and the trial court divided the marital estate, which consisted of the increased value of assets held by the husband at the time of the marriage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
