 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Jones, AC 28038,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence because an investigatory seizure of defendant was justified under Conn. Const. art. I, §§ 7 and 9 in that the police had a reasonable and articulable suspicion of illegal activity as a police detective saw defendant drinking beer while driving and defendant parked illegally.
|
|||||
| State v. McCarroll, AC 28189,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a father's claim, that two support orders failed to take into account his indigence and substantially deviated from the child support guidelines in multiple prior proceedings, had been raised, litigated, and decided in prior proceedings, the doctrine of res judicata precluded reconsideration of the claims.
|
|||||
| State v. Natal, AC 28849,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not an abuse of discretion to revoke defendant's probation. The information presented to the trial court regarding the collection and testing of defendant's urine samples possessed some minimal indicia of reliability, and it was proper to admit a probation officer's testimony regarding his failure in inpatient drug treatment programs.
|
|||||
| State v. Velez, AC 29283,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 24, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense counsel waived challenge to jury instruction by agreeing to it. Impeachment of defendant's credibility with prior felony convictions was proper, as evidence was probative of credibility and limiting instruction was given after testimony and in final charge. Defendant was not denied fair trial by one instance of prosecutorial impropriety.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
