 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rouleau v. Walter D. Sullivan Co., CV020821210S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Undisputed proof showed subcontractor and its insurer refused to defend contractor in worker's slip and fall action, so subcontractor breached subcontract duties to defend and provide insurance coverage; indemnification required factual determination on whether subcontractor's work caused worker's fall, so summary judgment was denied on that claim.
|
|||||
| Sikand v. Wilson-Coker, SC 17244,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since "medical services covered by Medicaid" meant services for which the Medicaid program actually would pay, not services of a type that were covered by Medicaid, an individual was not entitled to nonemergency medical transportation services to and from her psychologist's office under the state Medicaid program.
|
|||||
| Sowell v. Konover Constr. Corp., X04CV990103528S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sowell v. Konover Constr. Corp., X04CV000103528S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As there was evidence that a worker sustained significant life-threatening and permanent injuries at the time of an accident, the worker testified as to ongoing and significant permanent pain and blackouts due to hydrocephaly and a shunt, there was no basis for a remittitur under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-216a where the worker was awarded $ 2,833,000.
|
|||||
| State v. Dixson, (AC 25570), (AC 25651),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the record indicates that the prisoner received what he bargained for when entering into his plea agreement with the State, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the prisoner's motion to correct the sentence.
|
|||||
| State v. Jones, (AC 26193),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant failed to file for suppression, and did not seek review of his unpreserved constitutional claims, when the evidence submitted to the trial court was consistent with the finding that he had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, his conviction for the same was upheld.
|
|||||
| State v. Morocho, AC 23982,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the jury heard evidence that defendant refused to identify himself to the victim when she awoke, he attempted to remove her blanket, touch her all over her body, and tried to kiss her, there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant of violating Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-70(a).
|
|||||
| State v. Wheatland, AC 25947,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 17, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: At plea canvass, defendant indicated he understood all possible sentencing under plea agreement, so strict adherence to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 39-19, was not required for voluntary and knowing plea; plea withdrawal under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 39-27(3), was properly denied as sentence did not exceed agreement.
|
|||||
| Stebbins v. Stebbins, FA980067654S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a husband's weekly salary was $ 1,477, the court considered the criteria set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-82 and declined to modify his $700 weekly alimony payment upon his retirement. The court granted the wife's motion for an order regarding wage garnishment to satisfy the alimony payment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
