 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alfred Chiulli & Sons v. Mountain View Dev., CV 990587498,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was allowed a prejudgment attachment of defendant's property after the court found that it was more probable than not that plaintiff would prevail on its breach of contract claim at trial.
|
|||||
| Blakeman Constr. v. Conservation Comm'n of Newtown, CV 990334114S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conservation commission properly imposed conditions on construction company's proposed development near wetlands since conditions represented balance between development and need to protect and preserve wetlands.
|
|||||
| Dime Sav. Bank of N.Y. v. Grossman Acquistion Co., CV 990431345S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prejudgment granted in action to recover on automobile financing agreement; plaintiff faced huge loss from defendants converting proceeds of vehicle sales, its security was weak, and was accruing interest.
|
|||||
| Hooke v. Hooke, FA 980063036S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant wife was awarded a share of martial property, alimony and attorney fees.
|
|||||
| Juan R., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parental rights of the parents of a minor child was terminated because the Department of Children and Families proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination was in the best interest of the child.
|
|||||
| Lawners, Inc. v. City of Shelton, CV 990068057S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lubus v. Bridgewater Common, CV 990077750S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Genuine factual issue remained as to whether unusual circumstances existed imposing upon defendant board a duty to remove accumulating ice but no duty existed as to defendant landscaper until after the freezing rain stopped.
|
|||||
| Mullai v. Mullai, FA 990154483S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rangel v. Parkhurst, CV 960111612,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, December 7, 1999, Decided , December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in negligence action granted in favor of parents of minor child because parents were not liable to third persons even though they may have acquiesced in minor child's keeping alcoholic beverages in home.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
