 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Costa v. Costa, (AC 18958),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 4, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of marital dissolution was affirmed because there was no showing that the trial court abused its discretion or could not reasonably conclude as it did, based on the facts presented.
|
|||||
| Eismeier v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Guilford, CV 990424273S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 4, 2000, Decided , April 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning commission properly approved permit to allow operation of motel since substantial evidence supported finding that application conformed with zoning code, including sufficiency of lot to support sanitary facilities.
|
|||||
| Hunter v. American Honda Fin. Corp., CV 990587409,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, April 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant violated Connecticut Uniform Commercial Code in repossession of plaintiffs automobile because defendant failed to include the unaccelerated amount due on the note in a repossession notice sent to plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, (AC 18371),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 4, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Homeowner's unfair trade practices act attorney fee award was affirmed despite suffering no damages; denial of her contract-based motion for attorney fees incurred defending contractor's complaint was reversed and remanded.
|
|||||
| Kalamian v. City of Norwich Zba, 116455,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, April 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Keogh v. Salinas, CV 980499155,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 4, 2000, Decided , April 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence existed supporting hearing officer's conclusion that plaintiff was driving drunk and that he refused to take breath test, so the court affirmed suspension of his license.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Lee, FA 990067407S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 4, 2000, Decided , April 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the evidence presented established the allegation that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, the court dissolved the marriage, divided the assets, and awarded the parties joint legal custody of minor child.
|
|||||
| Lombard v. Peters, (SC 16162),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 4, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A committee appointed by a court to conduct a foreclosure sale was not entitled to qualified immunity for negligently identifying certain real estate as being part of the property included in the sale.
|
|||||
| Moody v. Sportsmen's Ath. Club, 553361,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, April 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attachment of real estate granted because there was probable cause plaintiffs would have prevailed on liability issue. The case alleged simple negligence and thus no law limited plaintiff's claim to an action under Connecticut's Dram Shop Act.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
