 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clark v. Hunt, CV0287877,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The homeowners were not entitled to punitive damages because the painter displayed neither a reckless indifference to the rights of the homeowners nor an intentional and wanton violation of those rights.
|
|||||
| Conn. Luxury Home Builders v. Chudecki, CV020819738,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute which stated measure of damages for improperly cutting another's trees in cases where compensatory damages were, absent statute, recoverable, did not set forth sole measure of damages; thus, owner's claim for general damages was not stricken.
|
|||||
| Curtin v. Burger, CV920128104,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The statements of the dominant estate owner, who destroyed property, did not support intentional infliction of emotional distress. But, the intentional, willful disregard of the servient estate owner's rights justified punitive damages.
|
|||||
| Deleon v. J.B. Hunt Transp., CV020815226S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a complaint alleged a lease of the owner's vehicle, the recklessness statute abrogated the common law and a motion to strike was denied; where no allegation of recklessness was alleged, the motion was granted.
|
|||||
| Dolan v. Creative Crafts, CV020097693S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act counterclaim sufficiently alleged that the landlord was acting in his trade or business, alleged a pattern of conduct within a trade or business, but did not meet the FTC's criteria of the "cigarette rule."
|
|||||
| Giulietti v. City of New Haven, CV010453664,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured persons proved that a traffic accident and their resultant injuries were caused by the negligence of city's employee in failing to have his truck under control, failing to apply his brakes reasonably, and in failing to stop at a stop sign.
|
|||||
| Grimm v. Grimm, FA010341257,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved on grounds that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, the marital property was divided, and the husband was ordered to pay alimony to the wife and to contribute to the wife's attorney fees.
|
|||||
| Letizia v. Karam, CV020281711S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where agreement for sale of real property permitted sellers chance to remedy defects found in inspection, and conflicting evidence was put forth as to whether sellers actually had this chance, summary judgment in breach of contract case was improper.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. Blonder, CV020816377,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
