LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - January 16, 2003

  
Mirault v. Warden, CV982788, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court reduced prisoner's presentence confinement credit by eight days on one docket (since those days were credited to a different docket) and denied prisoner's habeas corpus petition; presentence confinement was to be credited only once.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pocevic v. Conn. Distribs., CV980357030S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Complaint failed to provide facts to support claim that employer and co-worker desired the consequences of their acts, or that they knew that consequences were substantially certain to occur. Count for intentional workplace misconduct was stricken.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
RYA Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV010805349S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Zoning commission's denial of a subdivision application was reversed where the property was properly zoned and frontage was available. Road condition was a concern, but the applicant should not have been left unable to subdivide its property.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rice v. Fotovat, CV970345122, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In negligence claim against the doctor and hospital, an issue of fact remained as to whether resident who caused injury was doctor's borrowed servant, as hospital paid resident, assigned resident to surgery, and benefitted financially from resident.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rodney v. Desimone Enters., CV010807502, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2003, Decided , January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The second motion for summary judgment was denied because it raised the same issues as the first motion for summary judgment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Salamon v. Ferrigno, CV99367177S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 16, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Jury could reasonably have found that there was no third vehicle which allegedly caused traffic accident, and was entitled to infer that cause of accident was the result of negligent conduct in one or more of the ways specified in the complaint.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Hanson, (AC 22841), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2003, officially released n11 January 16, 2003, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
View this case - free  

Overview: It was error for a trial court to allow a nolle to enter over defendant's objection without obtaining from the State the representations mandated by statute. The proper remedy was a remand to the trial court.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.