 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sequenzia v. Guerrieri Masonry, Inc., AC 29308,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 31, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subcontractor was entitled to a new trial in plaintiff's negligence suit because plaintiff had knowledge of the dangerous condition which led to his injury, and that danger was open and obvious, eliminating any alleged duty to warn. Thus, it was improper for trial court to charge the jury on the failure to warn specification of negligence.
|
|||||
| Silverstein v. Laschever, AC 28917,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 31, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probate court's order approving an application to mortgage estate property was improper because a prior probate court order that the estate be distributed was conclusive on the parties pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 45a-24, and thus the property was not subject to further probate orders, including an order allowing the mortgage.
|
|||||
| State v. Alvaro F., SC 18254,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 31, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Cyr, SC 17975,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 31, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence, in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 14-227a(a), was reinstated as the fact that he started the car remotely and still needed to insert the ignition key to have movement was but a temporary impediment that did not preclude a finding of operation.
|
|||||
| State v. Madigosky, SC 18263,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 31, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of murder. Irrespective of the order in which the jury was directed to consider his defenses of mental disease or defect and extreme emotional disturbance, that sequence did not dilute the State's burden of proof on the element of intent or undermine defendant's ability to present evidence relevant to that element.
|
|||||
| State v. Silva, AC 25517,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 31, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As there was adequate evidence to support an inference that defendant fled because she was guilty and wanted to evade apprehension, where she ran away from police officers who had instructed her not to leave, crossed a street, entered her mother's car and drove away, the consciousness of guilt instruction was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
