 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Browning v. Browning, FA000556809S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court, in dissolution judgment, awarded husband his inherited property but did not specifically list husband's antiques, many of which were inherited, it decided not to hold wife in contempt for failing to give husband his antiques.
|
|||||
| City of Hartford v. City of W. Hartford, CV030827572S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2004, Decided , January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The motion to intervene was denied because the putative intervenors did not have an especially compelling interest in the controversy where they had not been specially and injuriously affected as to property or other legal rights.
|
|||||
| Dandapani v. Dandapani, FA020345336S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 16, 2004, Decided , January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon reargument the court made adjustments as to the issue of tax credit to the ex-husband, the issue of expenses for the family home, the payment of the ex-wife's liabilities, and the payment of the children's college expenses.
|
|||||
| Florence v. Town of Plainfield, File No. CV-03 0069580S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 16, 2004 Decided , January 16, 2004, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In administratrix's suit against town and pre-warned police officers when boyfriend killed mother, identifiable person/imminent harm exception to governmental immunity applied and mother and viable fetus were protected by wrongful death statute.
|
|||||
| Harris v. Woodbury Ski Area, CV010164374S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered for an injured child and his father in a negligence action against a ski area; the ski area knew of the existence of a metal object in a snow bank, and thus failed in its duty to maintain the area in a safe condition.
|
|||||
| Manifold v. Regaglia, CV020124891,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiffs filed an action against government officials in their official capacities seeking monetary damages, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, as the waiver of the claims commissioner had not been obtained.
|
|||||
| Petrucelli v. Bartimoccia, FA020346626S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 16, 2004, Decided , January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the evidence did not support matters sought to be reargued by the parties, it was not in the children's best interest, or the statutory criteria had previously been considered, the parties' requests to reargue were denied.
|
|||||
| Rogan v. Phaneuf, CV030284740S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In Connecticut, leaving a key in a car's ignition switch, enabling its misappropriation leading to injury, could constitute negligence, but special defense of failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted was invalid.
|
|||||
| Wright v. Warden, 565525,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 16, 2004, Decided , January 16, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prisoner's habeas corpus petition was dismissed; a change in classification of conspiracy to commit murder to a parole-ineligible crime was not an ex post facto violation, as defendant would not have been granted parole based on his crime.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
