|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - April 5, 2000
|
| |
Davidoff v. Davidoff, FA 980169414S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Gerathy v. Dojny, CV 990066394S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The plaintiff submitted a copy of deposition testimony of the defendant which showed that there were no genuine issues of material fact as to defendant's liability in an automobile collision action.
|
|
| |
Grandison v. Correia, CV 990156646S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Extradition warrant challenge was dismissed because demanding state had determined probable cause, thus asylum state court had no authority to adjudicate whether petitioner was same person victim identified.
|
|
| |
Livolsi v. Changes Cafe, CV 99068129S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where second count of plaintiff's complaint set forth manner with specificity in which defendant was more than merely negligent in selling alcohol to intoxicated person, motion to strike denied.
|
|
| |
Salter v. H&M Sachse, CV 98410515S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where contractor's expert witness testified that garage was not in compliance with building code, and that roof pitch was incorrect, plaintiff proved breach of contract and CUPTA violations.
|
|
| |
Secondo v. Era Northeast Realty, CV 0072197S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The motion to strike the second count of the complaint, CUTPA, was granted because the facts, as pleaded, fell far short of alleging aggravating circumstances as were necessary to support a CUTPA claim.
|
|
| |
Viscounti v. Pepper, CV 990065717S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike counts arising from real property purchase was denied because complaint did not state all pertinent facts; Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices claim was struck as complaint did not include proper allegations.
|
|
| |
Yale v. Santamauro, X01CV 970147184S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, April 5, 2000, Decided , April 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In insurance fraud action, court awarded damages by totaling premiums paid less surrender value of each policy, by calculating loss of use of money paid, and for attorney fees under CUTPA.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|