 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Jonathan M., (SC 16330),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut father could not collaterally attack termination of parental rights via habeas corpus petition alleging ineffective counsel; legislative concern to protect children with permanent placement was paramount.
|
|||||
| In re Tyrone J., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 16, 2001, Decided , January 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother and father's parental rights were terminated because it was in the best interests of child. Mother and father had not contacted agency regarding child's well-being and had not recognized him on special occasions.
|
|||||
| Jaynes v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 19880),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner did not meet burden of proving trial court's denial of petition for certification to appeal denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus was abuse of discretion, or that injustice was committed, his appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Northrup v. Northrup, FA000070657S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 16, 2001, Decided , January 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court awarded only nominal alimony and child support in the dissolution of the parties' marriage; defendant husband caused the marital breakdown, but plaintiff wife engaged in an affair with defendant's brother during the marriage.
|
|||||
| Reed v. Hathaway, CV960254337S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 16, 2001, Decided , January 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Deceased employee's estate could not sue co-employee for decedent's death (caused by co-employee running over decedent while driving a vehicle) because statute did not provide for action based on recklessness.
|
|||||
| Southern New Eng. Tel. Co. v. Provenzano, CV000435699,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court rejected the finding of facts and revoked the reference, when under the facts found the court found it could not conclude defendant was either a party to the contract for advertising services or was unjustly enriched by the services.
|
|||||
| State v. Matute, (AC 20020),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: 1997 amendment adding three year statute of limitations to statute permitting withdrawal of Alford plea based on trial court's failure to advise defendant of deportation consequences of plea, applied retroactively to defendant's 1993 plea.
|
|||||
| State v. Mims, (AC 19694),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction of assault of a peace office was upheld because the cumulative impact of the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict.
|
|||||
| State v. Sotomayor, (AC 20518),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant engaged in conduct creating grave risk of death to another person, such that he could not have been convicted of second degree manslaughter and he was not entitled to instruction on that lesser included offense.
|
|||||
| State v. Wragg, (AC 20000),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 16, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As defense counsel's cross-examination of a police officer elicited testimony that defendant had a criminal record, and she did not move to strike this testimony or for any other relief, trial court had no obligation to take action sua sponte.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
