|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 20, 2004
|
| |
|
| |
Lawrence Mall of New Haven v. City of W. Haven, CV030478088,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action challenging a city's method of collecting back taxes, a group of taxpayers satisfied their burden of showing that the case met all of the requirements governing class certification based on commonality of their claims against the city.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Motiva Enters. v. Town of Greenwich, CV020189677S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an appeal from the assessment value of real property, the property owner failed to prove that the city, in assessing three properties, over valued any of the properties based on possible uses, sizes, and income possibilities for the properties.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nat'l Collectors v. Tierney, CV010277857S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the borrower submitted two letters from the FDIC demanding payment under the notes as proof that the statute of limitations had run, the borrower was not entitled to summary judgment, as the uncertified letters were inadmissible at trial.
|
|
| |
Quintana v. Evergreen Nursery, Inc., CV020282526S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Contractor's indemnity claim did not defeat employer's workers' compensation exclusivity defense. Although contractor alleged that parties had independent legal duty based upon contract, it did not allege express or implied promise of indemnity.
|
|
| |
Richards v. Richards, FA030080577S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The parties' very brief marriage was dissolved and neither party was to blame where there were major financial problems and difficulties in balancing a family that included the wife's children from a prior marriage. Alimony was not warranted.
|
|
| |
Schweitzer v. Aidinis, X08CV000177860,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT STAMFORD, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike the special defense of contributory negligence was granted in part as to the pleadings of two defendants, who did not allege causation in their pleadings, but was denied in part as to the pleadings of the remaining defendants.
|
|
| |
Sound House Condo. Ass'n v. Berry, CV030399566S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a condominium association never acquired personal jurisdiction, due to lack of proper service, over a mortgagee in an action to foreclose its statutory lien, the trial court could open the judgment of foreclosure.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback