 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Olson v. Bristol-Burlington Health Dist., (AC 24955),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 18, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's complaint was adequate to state a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress where her allegations constituted a viable claim and she did not have to allege that the district's conduct was either extreme or outrageous.
|
|||||
| Philbrick v. State, CV030829941S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 18, 2005, Decided , January 18, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Patient's medical malpractice claim against state university hospital was not subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction both because it was not clear that her notice of claim was in fact untimely filed and because 2003 Conn. Acts 17 (Spec. Sess.), enacted pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 4-148(b), did not violate Conn. Const. art. I, ¿ 1.
|
|||||
| Richardson v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 24598,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 18, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the inmate failed to present sufficient evidence that he had exhausted his administrative remedies within the DOC's grievance process, the trial court did not err by granting the DOC summary judgment as to the inmate's constitutional claims.
|
|||||
| Shearn v. McGinnis, CV044000327,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 18, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In buyers' suit, alleging that sellers misrepresented condition of pool on property bought by buyers, order for prejudgment remedy under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-278 et seq. was granted where evidence showed that damage to pool was such that it could not have begun after closing and where it was unlikely that sellers were unaware of pool's condition.
|
|||||
| State v. Anderson, (AC 24331),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 18, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although court did not know, based on general verdict, whether jury convicted defendant of risk of injury to child based on his having given girl bloody nose or his sexually assaulting her or both; there was sufficient evidence to support conviction.
|
|||||
| State v. Sargent, (AC 23863),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 18, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a prosecutor committed misconduct by mischaracterizing the testimony of a witness during closing arguments in a drug case, a reversal was not required because it was highly unlikely that it had any effect on jury deliberations.
|
|||||
| Stavola v. Costa, CV030350462S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 18, 2005, Decided , January 18, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion by pub and pub's owner to strike injured party's negligence claim was granted because the claim did not sufficiently allege a cognizable cause of action given that 2003 Conn. Acts 91 (Reg. Sess.) prohibited any cause of action sounding in common-law negligence against liquor seller in sale of alcoholic liquor to person aged 21 or older.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
