Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - March 11, 2008
	State v. Wright, AC 28037, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 11, 2008, Officially Released View this case - free   Overview: Where defendant ran into a building and hid in a closet, because there was evidence to support a conclusion that defendant intended to interfere with the police, the court's finding that the State met its burden of proof on the charge of burglary in the third degree was not clearly erroneous. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Vincent v. City of New Haven, SC 17661, SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 11, 2008, Officially Released View this case - free   Overview: While the surviving spouse of a city employee was entitled to burial expenses and weekly compensation calculated as a percentage of the deceased employee's earnings under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-306, the city was not required to provide the surviving spouse with health insurance coverage following the death of her husband. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wright v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 27956, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 11, 2008, Officially Released View this case - free   Overview: An appellate court could not review a habeas corpus petitioner's claim that a habeas court improperly ruled that he had not been deprived of effective assistance of counsel because the record was inadequate. The habeas court's decision contained no findings or analysis, and petitioner did not seek review of the denial of his articulation motion. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.