 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berman & Sable v. Nat'l Loan Investors, X06CV000167145S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 16, 2002, Decided , January 16, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client's counterclaim in law firm's suit for fees was legally insufficient and was stricken because it asserted both an express contract and claimed unjust enrichment in the same count.
|
|||||
| Fine v. Bork, CV010808586,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 16, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was probable cause that majority owner of two limited liability companies acted in bad faith by unilaterally amending operating agreement of one company to become sole member and dissolving other company, appropriating assets to himself.
|
|||||
| Freudenthal v. Freudenthal, CV9988699S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 16, 2002, Decided , January 16, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff waived the 120 day limitation for a judge to rule on motions where she did not file a motion for reassignment to another judge within 14 days after the 120 day period expired.
|
|||||
| In re Kirk R., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, January 16, 2002, Decided , January 16, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While parent was imprisoned, requirement of reunification services other than visitation was generally excused. By his acts of parental commission and omission, father had denied child care, guidance, or control needed for his well being.
|
|||||
| McKenzie v. Dattco, Inc., 541370,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 16, 2002, Decided , January 16, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As matter of law and public policy, verdict in injured party's favor on claim against insurer for underinsured motorist benefits was reduced by the $ 75,000 the injured party had received in settlements from tortfeasors in the action.
|
|||||
| Panagopoulos Builders v. Jewusiak, CV990493927S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Homeowners owed contractor $ 87,515 for work performed and materials supplied in constructing home. Contractor was denied prejudgment interest, where parties had legitimate dispute, and homeowners made fair offer of judgment that was refused.
|
|||||
| Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc., File No. X07CV990072908S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, January 16, 2002, Decided , January 16, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation exclusivity provision barred suit against employer; intentional injury exception did not apply, as employees failed to show that employer believed its conduct would lead, inevitably, to their respiratory illnesses.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
