|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 18, 2007
|
| |
Antonellis v. Miller, CV980411546S, Opinion No.: 96762,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff's jury claim, filed in conjunction with reply to amended answer and special defenses, was stricken. The filing of the amended answer, which corrected a scrivener's error, did not give rise to a new period for filing jury claims under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-215 and no other jury claim had ever been made in the case, since its 1998 filing.
|
|
| |
Block v. Bradford, CV064020389S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deprimo v. Chiarelli, CV010454691S, Opinion No.: 96764,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Dicos v. Bolesta, X04CV040104056S, Opinion No.: 96759,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Gold v. Rowland, CV020813759S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motions for determination under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. App. P. § 61-4 were granted as issues resolved by partial granting of motion to dismiss were of such significance to determination of outcome of case that any delay resulting from immediate review of issues on appeal was well-justified by savings in time and expense it would produce.
|
|
| |
Krukiel v. Krukiel, (MMX)FA950074621S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the ex-wife lobbied the parties' boys with conscious and unconscious negative feelings toward their father over an extended period of time, and the boys projected it onto the ex-husband, there was a substantial change in circumstances as the boys were severely alienated from their father.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Burnell, MV06479034S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 7 AT MERIDEN, January 18, 2007, Decided , January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss, on the basis of double jeopardy, the information filed in his intoxicated driving prosecution was denied; the criminal prosecution did not constitute double jeopardy even though defendant's license had already been suspended as the administrative suspension was remedial rather than punitive in nature.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
