 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Acker, (AC 23407),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 20, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in dismissing a nuisance charge against defendant based on excessive dog barking, as the statute in question did not require the State to prove which specific dog or dogs at a kennel engaged in excessive barking.
|
|||||
| State v. Camera, (AC 23117),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 20, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of the uncharged misconduct evidence was not error, because the evidence satisfied both prongs of the applicable analysis, in that it was both relevant and material, and its probative value outweighed its prejudicial effect.
|
|||||
| State v. Esposito, (AC 23037),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 20, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of sexual assault in the third degree where he first tried to get his victim's attention by calling to her and then chasing her and grabbing her by the breast while attempting to prevent her from calling out.
|
|||||
| State v. Green, (AC 22968),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 20, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal was not error, as trial court did not err in not instructing jury that conviction as accessory and as conspirator were legally inconsistent; defendant could properly be found guilty of both.
|
|||||
| State v. Santos, (AC 23766),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 20, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: From the cumulative impact of the evidence presented, there was sufficient evidence for the jury reasonably to conclude that defendant had intended to agree with another person to murder the victim.
|
|||||
| State v. Turner, (SC 16711),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 20, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's guilty plea did not result from ineffective assistance of counsel, he had no nonfrivolous grounds for an appeal; therefore, defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to consult with him regarding his appellate rights.
|
|||||
| Wells v. Town of Plainfield, CV020068211,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 20, 2004, Decided , January 20, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike was denied as to two claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress; whether actions taken by other police officers against the plaintiff officers were extreme and outrageous was a question for the jury.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
