|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 20, 2000
|
| |
Barber v. Glick, CV 990589710S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 20, 2000, Decided , January 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike fraud and civil conspiracy counts of complaint was denied; motion to strike was not proper procedure to contest failure to comply with request to revise and allegations stated claim for civil conspiracy.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gardella Trust v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., CV 960150585S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 20, 2000, Decided , January 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court overruled defendant insurance company's motion to dismiss claiming that original plaintiffs lacked standing to bring action since they never had any legal interest in defendant's annuity policy. Law of case applied.
|
|
| |
Heather Ridge Condos. Assoc. v. Nemeth, CV 960329755,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 20, 2000, Decided , January 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Homecomings Fin. Network v. Nicholas, CV 990078872S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 20, 2000, Decided , January 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An application for protection from foreclosure action was denied unless the mortgagee filed appropriate financial or other documentation demonstrating her ability to make mortgage payments.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|