 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Austin v. Danbury Hosp., CV98333740S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed a patient's action against a hospital when she was knocked to the floor by the revolving front door and injured. The patient did not provide evidence to support her specifications of negligence.
|
|||||
| Bliss v. Bliss, FA9866235,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff father's motion for modification of judgment regarding custody and visitation was denied where he failed to show that a transfer of custody from defendant mother to plaintiff was in the children's best interest.
|
|||||
| Carusillo v. Associated Women's Health Specialists, P.C., CV960132722S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The verdict in plaintiff patient's favor in her malpractice suit was set aside, since the only evidence supporting her causation theory was her expert's hearsay testimony about his reliance on unidentified medical literature.
|
|||||
| Chase Manhattan Bank v. Grasso, CV990173244,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where bank sent notice of default on note and mortgage while defendants were subject to bankruptcy's automatic stay, notice was effective and did not violate automatic stay, and bank was entitled to summary judgment as to liability only.
|
|||||
| City of Waterbury v. Coradazzi, CV970138259S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In water lien foreclosure action, general lien statute applied, not just water lien statute, and under the general statute, water user was entitled to a credit against the debt of one-half of difference between appraised value and selling price.
|
|||||
| Durham v. Warden, 554856,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of habeas corpus denied, as amended statute was not applied ex post facto to defendant's parole eligibility. Defendant, at the time of his offense, had notice of the statute and the parole board's broad discretion.
|
|||||
| Edmond v. Promus Hotel Corp., CV990118824S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In slip and fall action, motion to strike CUTPA claim was granted where it was not pled with legal sufficiency. Claim did not allege facts supporting conclusion that defendant's actions were deceptive or caused substantial injury to consumers.
|
|||||
| Ficocelli v. O'Connor, CV990495522S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant board of education's motion to strike a claim of negligence brought by plaintiff was denied; plaintiff alleged sufficient fact that, if proven, would invoke an identifiable person-imminent harm exception to governmental immunity.
|
|||||
| First Union Nat'l Bank v. Gall, CV990153628S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was granted; plaintiff met its burden of showing it fulfilled the requirements to foreclose on the tax liens in question, and defendants failed to submit any evidence of a genuine issue of material fact.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
