|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 21, 2004
|
| |
|
| |
Bero v. Leitrim Enters., CV030401234,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The parents of a person who was allegedly killed in a car accident could not state a claim for loss of filial consortium because there was no such action in Connecticut. A bystander emotional distress claim failed because it was improperly pleaded.
|
|
| |
Engleman v. Madhuribakhru, CV03082610,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a defendant reserved priority to take plaintiffs' depositions first and plaintiffs had not provided the requested medical records and authorizations, the court's previous order on plaintiffs' motion to compel was vacated.
|
|
| |
Hotchkiss v. Hotchkiss, FA020174825,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved on the ground of irretrievable breakdown and the husband was awarded physical custody of the child, one-half of the child's Social Security check, and the marital home upon payment of a lump sum to the wife.
|
|
| |
Kozlowski v. Comm'r of Transp., CV990589488,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Subcontractor's employee was traveler on road within meaning of Connecticut Defective Highway Statute, notwithstanding that he was hired indirectly by state to do work on roadway, as he was not hired to make repairs to the defective catch basin.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Olsen v. Town of Sherman Tree Warden, CV020347107S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where tree was removed during citizens' appeal of tree warden's determination requiring removal of tree, appeal was moot. Removal was in accordance with law, as warden had inspected tree and determined that it was hazardous to public safety.
|
|
| |
Raymond Realty Co. v. Litchfield Inland Wetlands Comm'n, CV0389427,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owner was not denied fundamental fairness in the handling of its application for regulated wetlands activity where it failed to show bias by wetlands commissioners and even though it was not able to cross-examine the commission's expert.
|
|
| |
Raymond Realty Co. v. Litchfield Inland Wetlands Comm'n, CV030089428S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owner was not denied fundamental fairness in the handling of its application for regulated wetlands activity where it failed to show bias by wetlands commissioners and even though it was not able to cross-examine the commission's expert.
|
|
| |
Smith Bros. Woodland Mgmt. v. Monroe Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020397053S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 21, 2004, Decided , January 21, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Planning and zoning commission's denial of a special exception to permit a mulch processing operation was an abuse of discretion as the operation was a wholesale commercial use, and there was no health risk attached to the operation.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback