 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Mancuso, CR 96125234, CR 96125235,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION, December 9, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Longer sentence for defendant than for co-defendant was reasonable where co-defendant had no criminal record, and defendant held gun in commission of crimes.
|
|||||
| Stoner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Conn., CV 970480619S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 9, 1999, Decided , December 9, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer was entitled to judgment in insured's suit alleging breach of contract and intentional infliction of emotional distress; claim for orthodontic treatment was specifically excluded by policy's exclusionary language.
|
|||||
| Suffield Dev. Assoc. v. National Loan Investors, L.P., X04CV 990118051S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, December 9, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant entitled to a portion of settlement of a lender liability action even after reversal for error; reversal did not remove the settlement proceeds from the provisions of a stipulated judgment in a foreclosure action.
|
|||||
| Tiede v. Administrator, CV 990171246,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 9, 1999, Decided , December 9, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision dismissing appeal of determination that plaintiff was overpaid unemployment benefits and subject to penalty was affirmed because review board was justified in concluding whether late appeal was excusable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
