 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Goellner v. Mga, Inc., CV980164759S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite a federal consent decree supporting former employee's claims for unpaid salary and retaliation, trial was required on many issues, especially damages; existence of malice was unsuitable for summary disposition.
|
|||||
| In re Aubrey S., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there had been a prior adjudication of neglect, respondent father did not have to be given specific steps to take to aid in the return of his child before the termination of parental rights petition could be granted.
|
|||||
| In re Chaquira M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where parents were drug addicts and made little effort to rehabilitate in order to have daughter returned to them, court terminated parental rights, despite petitioner's failure to do more than absolute minimum to assist reunification.
|
|||||
| Lacerenza v. Stamford Zoning Bd., CV980169017,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Neighbor's appeal from zoning board's grant of a side yard variance was sustained because the applicants failed to show hardship. The only evidence of hardship that appeared in the record was personal and self-created.
|
|||||
| Martinelli v. Jacaruso, CV980144336S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff did not prove her brother used relationship with father to induce parents to transfer property to him, and there was no evidence he promised to hold property in trust with plaintiff, the suit for constructive trust failed.
|
|||||
| Municipal Funding v. City of Waterbury Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 000157984,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was substantial evidence in the record to support zoning authority's denial of defendant's special exception application, court could not say authority acted arbitrarily in denying application, and thus applicant's appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Piazza v. Hadley Sutherland, LLC, CV0083296,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The mechanic's lien filed against the landowner's property was ordered discharged because it was not filed within the prescribed statutory period.
|
|||||
| Pilot Corp. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV990494845S, CV990496559S, CV990497726S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 17, 2001, Decided , January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where record contained evidence of traffic congestion and poor air quality that would result from approval of special zoning exception, zoning board of appeals did not err in denying the application for exception.
|
|||||
| Player v. Warden, CV980412100S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Drug petitioner's application for an order of immunity for a witness who falsely testified was denied as there was no authority and no rationale for compelling a grant of immunity for false testimony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
