 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Law Offices of Ira B. Charmoy v. Lockery, 380135, 382937,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 21, 2003, Decided , January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A claim that a law firm had overcharged for legal fees was not a proper special defense to the firm's claim that the clients had fraudulently transferred property in order to avoid payment, and was stricken.
|
|||||
| Maffeo v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV010448331S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff did not need to allege more than one act to bring case under Connecticut UTPA. Plaintiff was allowed to bring action sounding in Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act when claim was used as vehicle to bring Connecticut UTPA count.
|
|||||
| Patrie v. Area Coop. Educ. Servs., CV000440418S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 21, 2003, Decided , January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The employee, who was employed as a teacher's assistant and driver by the employer, fell under the statutory provision requiring a board of education to indemnify teachers and others who were not teachers but were employees of the board.
|
|||||
| Phelps v. Lankes, (AC 22361),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 21, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in instructing the jury in an injured party's negligence action; although the initial instruction on proximate cause was improper standing alone, the trial court then properly instructed the jury on causation.
|
|||||
| Pierni v. Terrace Realty Assocs., CV010184620,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 21, 2003, Decided , January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A limited partner was entitled to an interlocutory order of mandamus allowing him access to a limited partnership's records, books, and documents, as the limited partner had a clear legal right to the materials pursuant to statute.
|
|||||
| Ruggiero v. Christoforo, CV989412137S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied deceased patient's administrator's motions to set aside and for new trial; expert testimony was proper to prove whether physician's prescribing a certain drug or sexual encounters were within standards of care or caused suicide.
|
|||||
| State v. Gonzalez, (AC 21597),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 21, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in failing to merge conviction on conspiracy offenses and in failing to merge conviction for possession of narcotics with conviction for possession of narcotics with intent to sell. Wavier of Miranda rights was made voluntarily.
|
|||||
| State v. McColl, (AC 20624),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 21, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for assault and robbery were affirmed as the trial court properly instructed the jury, there was no double jeopardy violation, and the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
|
|||||
| Stivachtis v. Travelers Ins. Co., CV980420305S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A verdict for an insurer was not set aside in an action on a fire policy where there was evidence that the insureds set the fire because, in part, the insureds did not object to the seating of an alternate juror after deliberations began.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
