Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - January 19, 2005
	Rite Aid Corp. v. Comm'r of Dep't of Soc. Servs. Conn., CV044000957S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 19, 2005, Decided , January 19, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A private provider's appeal of a revised audit determination, which reduced the amount recoupable by it from the State for providing drugs to persons eligible under public assistance programs, was dismissed because the audit did not require a determination of any rights and was merely an agency action. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Ross v. Lawton, 128837, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 19, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Scrivani v. Vallombroso, CV000441476S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 19, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because his agreements to perform home remodeling were either not in writing or not signed, a contractor violated the Home Improvement Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 20-429(a). He engaged in unfair and deceptive conduct in violation of Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act because he falsely represented that he was qualified to install a siding product. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Yolen & Perzin, LLC v. Wright, CV020514379S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 19, 2005, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.