LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - January 17, 2002

  
Berman & Sable v. Nat'l Loan Investors, L.P., X06CV000167145S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied law firm's motion to implead their former client's successor law firm and individual lawyer to be liable to former law firm under contribution or indemnity for former client's malpractice counterclaim against former law firm.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
City of New London v. Picinich, 554939, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW LONDON, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Communications Sys. v. Ceruzzi, CV960153343S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to strike counterclaim alleging violation of UTPA was denied where debtors stated valid caused of action based on creditor's negligent misrepresentation that it was the holder of note, when in fact note had already been assigned.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Depoto v. Vachon, CV960415156S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Moran v. Town of Berlin, (X06)CV010167143S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Orsini v. Interiors of Yesterday, CV010450081S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Term not expressly included was not to be read into lease unless it arose from lease provisions. Lease imposed no obligation on landlord but instead imposed obligation on tenant to comply with municipal rules and regulations.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Resurreccion v. Normandy Heights, CVN00041801, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A landlord's entry to replace some glass while the tenant was gone was an unauthorized entry. However, one such entry, without permission, was not harassment. The tenant failed to meet her burden of proof to show that items were stolen.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Zanoni v. Lynch, X07CV940076985S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, January 17, 2002, Decided , January 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An administratrix was granted summary judgment on plaintiffs' appeals of five probate decisions; the appeals were barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel, as plaintiffs brought exactly the same claims in a different action.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.