 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Audino v. Governors Ridge Ass'n, CV 980350432S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motions to strike as time barred were allowable as to plaintiff's fraud and negligent misrepresentation but not CUTPA claims as plaintiff had rights to allege facts to toll statute of limitations for the former claims only.
|
|||||
| Boynton v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., CV 960384734S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was not underinsured with respect to defendant city's underinsured motorist policy, where other driver's automobile insurance exceeded amount available to plaintiff under city's underinsured motorist coverage.
|
|||||
| Builders Concrete of Windham v. Cheney, CV 9868015S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no oral contract between a concrete supplier and a sub-contractor to pay for concrete supplied, where both parties understood that another party had ordered and would pay for the concrete.
|
|||||
| Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp., X06 CV 990153198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff mayor and city did not have standing to sue defendant gun manufacturers because plaintiffs' claimed injuries were too remote and the state did not give plaintiffs the authority to sue defendants.
|
|||||
| Gold v. Gold, FA 980419223S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A dissolution of marriage was granted with distribution of the parties' assets made in accordance with a pre-nuptial agreement despite defendant's initial marital financial contribution far exceeding that made by plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Hackett v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV 980077993,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insurer was granted summary judgment where, although plaintiff received less from the tortfeasor than her total policy limits, plaintiff properly received the per person uninsured coverage, not the per occurrence coverage.
|
|||||
| Hastedt v. Remodeling Contrs. Ass'n, X 06990156058S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendants, while not named in a federal complaint, were similarly situated and the allegations in the federal complaint were similar to those in plaintiffs' complaint, the federal stay order was controlling.
|
|||||
| Levy v. Levy, FA 960338026S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant father who lost engineering job through no fault of his own, had been regularly employed as an engineer for many years, and could not find another position was granted modification of alimony and support order.
|
|||||
| Noreika v. Edmund A.S. Jayaraj, CV 990152514S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mandamus request denied because plaintiff failed to show clear legal right to be restored to firefighter eligibility list and defendants had discretion to determine plaintiff unfit based on prior criminal conviction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
